Technology Category

It’s never been more important to steal from the British Government

No Comments »

Former Hypenotic team member/perennial Hypenotic community member Jorge sent over a site I can’t get enough of.

The British Government is moving their communications strategy into the 21st century and it looks they’re doing everything right. If it wouldn’t be too much to ask, I think everyone who commissions web design should steal the tenets of their ”Government Digital Service Design Principles”.

I haven’t seen such amazing clarity in web design principles since Patrick J. Lynch and Sarah Horton’s ”Web Style Guide” (now in it’s 3rd edition)

What’s so great about it?

To start, there’s a pop up warning that explains to first time visitors that the digital design guidelines are publicly available as an ALPHA release, not as “to-don’t” list, but for inspiration and education. They want to let visitors know that:

  • The site and methodology are a work in progress and will be iterated on.
  • Websites are not an end in themselves, they’re a way for prospective site users (people) to fulfill their needs

That a formal institution most often associated with bureaucracy is publicly releasing something by definition unfinished is a heretical act that will surely be whispered about by cultures trained to put their best foot forward always. But the web is changing all the time, and ever more rapidly. If the medium is fluid, shouldn’t the messages be?

The inspiration is also manifest in the site’s own simple, accessible, even inviting interface. There’s plenty of negative space (space between page elements) to make people feel like there’s no hurry here (“Keep calm…”), no hidden tricks that only the cognoscenti will understand. Good design is for everyone.

The website is also a boon for Designers, who can use it help turn clients into partners. While it can come pretty naturally for designers to see and solve other people’s communications problems, we’re notoriously our own worst clients. Since we can always think of ways to improve, getting our own work out the door is hard. With the insight our clients can pick up from this site, we can both be better collaborators.

Design is as much an approach–a mindset, as it is a process. And the Gov.UK Design Principles articulate the tenets of this approach in way that at once democratizes great design while rewarding it’s practitioners. Anyone can benefit from knowing these principles. And understanding the tenets makes it a lot easier for the lay person to spot professionals.

There will still be plenty of unlearning for people to do. We’ve been conditioned to think of websites as modern versions of traditional marketing items like brochures.

And of course, the system that pays for their development is still largely framed by the wrong measures, the wrong motivations:

“my dept needs real estate on the front page”

or

“I’ve already sold these banners”

Clearly, these objectives are misguided in a system that puts the visitor’s needs at the centre.

Often, we’re not spending our own money when designing websites, and accountability means a very literal form of short term return on investment that ends up being a “lose/lose” for all parties. The hard part is remembering we’re not designing screens, we’re designing experiences. For people. The hard part is manifest in the up front thinking and planning. So that’s what should be done. And paid for.

And there will still be plenty of hand-holding to help people address the perceptual challenges of each tenet. Designing user experiences is almost uniformly counterintuitive for traditional marketers. But I hope this site will be the starting point of many great conversations and even more subtle changes in web site design for years to come.

I could go on about the site all day, but maybe it’d be better if we regroup after you’ve had a look at it?

GDS design principles.



Email Etiquette: A review we could all benefit from

No Comments »

Sorry if this is a little 101 for some of you, but I had it set as an unfinished draft, probably hastily scrabbled together when someone who should know better abused my email reading patience.

The fact is that while email is ubiquitous and benefits us in too many obvious ways to warrant a blog post, one conversation we hear about increasingly is the burden of addressing it. Email’s ease of use lends itself to careless, ignorant and deliberately layered use.

So here’s a critical piece of email etiquette that some people could benefit from. I pulled it from a great list of 101 tips. Some of them are outdated or matter less depending on your platform or situation, but I’ve grabbed one section in particular here to focus on (my comments are in [ ]):

To, From, CC, BCc, RR, Subject:

  1. Only use Cc: when it is important for those you Cc: to know about the contents of the email. Overuse can cause your emails to be ignored. [I have 1000s unread]
  2. Don’t use Return Receipt (RR) on every single email. Doing so is viewed as intrusive, annoying and can be declined by the other side anyway.
  3. Include addresses in the To: field for those who you would like a response from.
  4. Include addresses in the Cc: field for those who you are just FYI’ing.
  5. Make sure your name is displayed properly in the From: field.
  6. Remove addresses from the To:, CC; and BCc: field that don’t need to see your reply. [BIG ONE. Unnecessary email can mean junkmail to some or just more work for others]
  7. Always include a brief Subject. No subject can get your email flagged as spam. [A good subject is like leaving a good phone message–it can help the recipient act more quickly]
  8. Think about your motives when adding addresses to To:, CC:, BCc. Use your discretion. [Many people Cc: as an ass covering measure–think about how that looks to the recipient]
  9. Never expose your friend’s or contact’s email address to strangers by listing them all in the To: field. Use BCc:! [BIG ONE. Email is private.Even if you trust the people you share  addresses with, it may make the owners of the addresses uncomfortable. Also, if enough people do this, everyone will have everyone's addresses].
  10. Make sure when using BCc: that your intentions are proper. To send BCc: copies to others as a way of talking behind someone’s back is inconsiderate.

via Email Etiquette: 101 Email Etiquette Tips.

Proper, or at least thoughtful use of basic tools like email can help us handle the exploding media fire-hose enough to keep benefitting from it. If you feel someone just isn’t respecting your privacy or time, you can always send them here: http://www.thanksbutno.com/



Why your newsletter sucks: Two

No Comments »

Headline News

In my recent post about fixing your email headline to get me to actually read it, I promised to show you how to test your headlines against your current ones that may be getting stale. And I’ll do that shortly.
But first, that post garnered some interesting responses.

Two people thought the example headline I gave sounded spammy and they’d unsubscribe if they got an email with that headline.

At least one commenter actually DID unsubscribe.

Is the notion of personalizing your headlines ill considered?

Curious to know, I did some cursory research to see whether anyone had stats on this. Results were quite divergent.

One provider said that personalization improved open rates on a sample of 202 million emails. Another said both open and click rates suffered.

Seems the practice is hotly contested.

Coming from some marketers (especially, um, spammers) personalizing a headline likely would seem spammy.

But I suspect that whether or not it does hinges on the relationship you have with your list.

For the record, I wasn’t suggesting that every email you send out should be personalized. But rather that if you don’t want your email to blend into the background noise in my inbox, for heaven’s sake grab me with your headlines.

One MailChimp post suggests that the best subject line is one that mirrors your audience’s expectations. That different subject lines apply to newsletters than special offers.

So how do you know what kinds of headlines will resonate with your list? Start split testing.

If you’re not familiar with the term, split- or A/B- testing refers to sending different versions of your email to different segments of your list and measuring the results.

Generally to start you’ll want to keep the variables to a minimum. For example, send the same email to two segments each with a different headline and see which one gets the best response.

Since many of our clients use MailChimp (as we do), here’s a link to an overview of the split testing features on Mailchimp . Be sure to watch the video as well.

MailChimp split test movie

After you’ve checked it out, come back here and let us know what you intend to test.



Jane Austen on Smartphones

1 Comment »

 

Why do people feel compelled to respond to the little messages coming through their phones immediately as if driven by compulsion?

MIT Professor Sherry Turkle delivers the best description I’ve ever heard when asked about this phenomenon in Fast Company.

It reminds me of how in Jane Austen, carriages are always coming, you’re waiting, it could be Mr. Bingley’s invitation to a ball. There’s some sense that the post is always arriving in Jane Austen. There’s something about email that carries the sense that that’s where the good news will come…. I try to figure out what it is that this little red light means to people. I think it’s that place for hope and change and the new, and what can be different, and how things can be what they’re not now. And I think we all want that.

I can understand butterflies and excitement awaiting the prospect of an invitation where this might go down:

 

But face it, an Evite to a party you don’t want to go to is not deserving of your undivided attention. The constant feeling of disappointment is much like the feelings Elizabeth Bennet expresses in Pride and Prejudice upon George Wickhams’ departure:

Upon the whole, therefore, she found what has been sometimes found before, that an event to which she had looked forward with impatient desire, did not, in taking place, bring all the satisfaction she had promised herself. It was consequently necessary to name some other period for the commencement of actual felicity; to have some other point on which her wishes and hopes might be fixed, and by again enjoying the pleasure of anticipation, console herself for the present, and prepare for another disappointment.

The anticipation contained within the simple gesture of a vibrating phone can be so profound.



Lytro Takes a Bite from Apple

No Comments »

Lytro Red Camera

It’s a sexy piece of technology and if you haven’t already heard of the game changing Lytro cameras you will soon. Lytro just unveiled a line of “light field” cameras that capture more colour, intensity and light per shot than traditional cameras. That makes for more vibrant photos, but most importantly, it allows users to change the focus within an image after it’s been taken. That’s right, you focus after you’ve taken the shot. (You can play around with how it all works on Lytro’s site.)

The camera is elongated with a rectangular shape. The lens is on one end and a LCD touch-screen display on the other. Power and shutter buttons, a USB port, and a touch-sensitive strip to move through its 8X zoom range are arranged along the sides. It boasts 8 gigs of storage and comes in 3 colours. Oh yeah, one more thing, they’ve included a social feature so that you can instantly share to Facebook.

Lytro sticks out from the crowd

Besides the revolutionary technology inside the camera, what is really striking is the design of the camera itself. The device looks nothing like a traditional point-and-shoot. It’s simple, clean, user-friendly and well, Apple-esque. If it had a metallic casing and the Apple icon you might even think that is was part of the Apple product lineup. Even browsing Lytro’s site, you can see elements of Apple in the sites use of colours, whitespace, gradients and simple actions.

Aesthetically pleasing objects appear to the user to be more effective, by virtue of their sensual appeal.

Just like Apple, you can see the thought that went into the design and how we might want/need to interact with it. It’s not only a product based on the principles of emotional design, it’s also a company that seems to have adopted and pushed Apple’s “Think Different” mantra into the photography space. And like the iPad, a product we didn’t know we needed until we held it in our hands, Lytro seems to have achieved the same thing.

To capture the complexity of “light field” technology and place it within a simple design is a pretty amazing thing. And as Steve Jobs said, “simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.”



Prismatic Identity: Social networking’s next challenge

No Comments »

Chris Poole knows a thing or two about how people behave online. He founded free-form free for all net sensation 4chan and Canvas. Don’t click the links if you don’t want to get stuck somewhere or question your sanity/sense of humour/values.

In this video from the web 2.0 summit in San Francisco that social networks that let us choose which facet of our personalities and/or interests we want to share will get online identity right.

I agree. I have friends who have 5 twitter accounts on which they interact with different audiences around often wildly different subject matter. Twitter makes it easier to disassociate your interests.

And I have clients still wrapping their heads around ways to use Facebook personally without overly influencing the way their brand is perceived on their Fan Page. Not that they’d do anything horrible online. But politics, religion, stances on or interests in specific social issues, they feel, can be inappropriate associations for their brand.

Chris suggests that Google Plus and Facebook both need to give users more control over context. The video is 8 minutes, but worth watching. Enjoy!



The World is a Little Less Shiny Today – Steve Jobs 1955-2011

No Comments »

I am a proud Apple fangirl.  From my iPhone to my Airport my electronic and computing life is completely mac.  It is a love affair that started 7 years ago when my ex gave me the first generation iPod nano for Christmukka.  Shortly after that I moved into a career with Apple retail, and that’s how I discovered Steve Jobs.

When I heard he had passed away last night I cried.  And I thought as I was snuffling through yet another of his keynotes at 1 in the morning, am I crazy to be reacting this way? He was a CEO of company I worked for, and someone I admired but I’d never met him. His words and innovations though had a huge impact on my life.

Before I worked for Apple I was a technophobe.  I used to date people who were computer savvy so that they would take care of my technology for me.  I had a palm trio and I used it to text, but the calendar was too confusing and I took only the occasional grainy photo.  When I started working at Apple they spent over a month training me  and getting me up to speed.  It opened up a whole new world to me and made me unafraid of technology.  Let me repeat that because I think that is at the heart of what made Steve so innovative, Apple made me UNAFRAID of technology.

After years of owning PCs and going to computer stores where I was talked down to and treated like an idiot here was a place I could learn and ask without fear.  And as an added bonus everything was pretty. This was relatable innovate technology available to most people and I got to sell it.  It was as with most jobs not without it’s flaws but I learned a lot working for Steve.  As did my co-workers and most of our customers in the store.  The Apple fans who used to come in and just rave about their laptops and iPods; People who just wanted to talk about how much better Apple products had made their lives were a testament to how Steve Jobs was much more than just a CEO of a good technology company. You just don’t see that anywhere else, have you ever seen a bunch of people in Best Buy talking about how awesome their Lenovo ThinkPads are?

As a person, he was far from perfect, and he did make some mistakes with Apple but he didn’t let those failures stop him. He was incredibly savvy, inspirational, brilliant, influential and we’ll be feeling the impact of his loss for a very long time.  Good bye Steve and thanks.